The Physio Forum - the home of online physiotherapy discussion

Home Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   The Physio Forum - the home of online physiotherapy discussion > Physiotherapy Discussion Areas, News and General Interest > Orthopaedic Physiotherapy
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Physio Links Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Orthopaedic Physiotherapy
Post all your questions and comments about issues relating to orthopaedic physiotherapy in this forum. Ask advice about things such as arthritis, joint replacement, splinting & plastering or factors in treating the acute unstable fracture.

Forum Supported By
 Image

Reply
Views: 268 - Replies: 2  
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1    
Old 27-07-2002, 07:49 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Referrals: 10885
Lumbar traction

I'm using mechanical traction for quite a few different lumbar conditions. I tend to use forces between 12 and 18 kilogram. Just started work in a different practice where one of the guys is using a minimum of 30 kg as he read in some research that that would be the minimum force required to distract the vertebras'
Can anyone point to further research or do you have any ideas opinions on this subject? I'd like to hear them
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2    
Old 07-08-2002, 09:00 PM
Eyean Eyean is offline
Physio Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1
Referrals: 0
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Eyean will become famous soon enough
re: Lumbar traction

I haven't got any references for you, but the Level I orthopaedic curriculum in Canada teaches that distraction of vertebrae is not necessary to achieve therapeutic effects. CLinically, this explains why manual traction can produce benefits even though I'm pretty sure we're not using 30kg of force. What do ya think about that?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3    
Old 08-08-2002, 12:42 AM
NARSTR NARSTR is offline
Physio Guru in the making
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 68
Referrals: 0
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 21
NARSTR will become famous soon enough
re: Lumbar traction

In Australia, the aim is to stretch only soft tissue. Something like 3-400 lbs is required for vertebral distraction and no-one knows why we would want to achieve this distraction anyway. Interestingly, relief from muscle tightness using a heat pack may be just as effiecient. We simply do not know.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Physio Forum - the home of online physiotherapy discussion > Physiotherapy Discussion Areas, News and General Interest > Orthopaedic Physiotherapy
Tags:




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
lumbar traction finnfysio Musculoskeletal/Outpatients 5 05-03-2007 09:24 AM
Lumbar traction aggrevates the pain sanagupta General Physiotherapy Discussion 19 19-09-2005 01:48 AM
Lumbar traction General Physiotherapy Discussion 0 27-07-2002 08:06 AM
LUMBAR TRACTION SU35 Musculoskeletal/Outpatients 0 12-02-2002 03:39 PM
HIP Traction lars Orthopaedic Physiotherapy 1 14-12-2000 12:40 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:23 PM.



Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0